Monday, April 23, 2012
Reflection #10
So today in my instructional design class, one of my classmates, Lauryn was teaching us about the United Nations. She used some simple youtube videos to help explain some of the concepts of the lesson. I thought this was a good example of how technology can help with teaching material to students. The videos were simplified, but not childish and it made it easy to understand something complicated like what one branch of the UN does. I have also seen incorrect use, so I guess for me this helps me think about whether or not some technology is necessary. I need to examine the content of the video and ask does it aid in students learning or is it just a filler and detrimental to their learning experience?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I really liked her videos too. I find videos a very effective way to reach students. I think long movies are at times a filler time for teachers where they can just catch a break but sometimes they are called for. I find short clips to be a better option if possible though.
ReplyDeleteWhy thank you Jordyn and Kristine!:) I just thought I would give you a little reasoning behind I chose the videos I did. First of all, I was talking about the United Nations, which of course I find interesting but know that it can be a somewhat "boring" topic for many students. Also knowing that it was necessary to teach through direct instruction I found the George Clooney video entertaining and informative as well as connecting with the popular culture of the students I would be teaching. In today's world it is near impossible to present a history lesson without either technology or a hands-on activity. When students see media in their lessons they perk up, hopefully understanding that history is not just dusty old textbook and snoozefest lectures, that history is the here and now, and that includes many aspects of technology.
ReplyDeleteLauryn :)